In the present PC subordinate world, the enthusiastic promoter must have the capacity to explore his way through each possible type of disclosure keeping in mind the end goal to successfully represent his or her client. Failure to seek the appropriate records or the failure to respond to discovery requests with the appropriate electronic discovery knowledge could potentially expose both client and attorney to the risk of sanctions for discovery abuses and/or result in the spoliation of evidence. Knowledge of the electronic evidence is crucial to any attorney hoping to retain clients. Once electronic evidence is in hand though, an attorney faces additional obstacles, specifically, regarding how to properly use such evidence. Gaining a true understanding of metadata can mean the difference between success and failure.
Metadata is more than simple electronic evidence. You should check out recent updates in information technology. General electronic disclosure ordinarily considers effectively open electronic records, such as those on an active network file server. Metadata describes how, when and by whom the particular set of data is collected and formatted. Metadata can often be thought of as the “DNA” of documents. It is hidden from view and often contains the most damaging information. Discovering the metadata behind a piece of data, such as a document or spreadsheet, can reveal the authors of the document, all comments and edits made and any other trait related to its creation. Mining for metadata is the newest tool in the ongoing battle between those seeking to conceal and those seeking to reveal electronic evidence.
The “hard” paper evidence obtained throughout the discovery process only reflects the most recent form of the document and often does not reveal the most useful information. Direct or cross-examination based strictly on the hard copy document restricts the examiner to questions regarding the information only contained on the printed page. It is therefore difficult to determine the document’s authenticity, its author and any edits made while the copy was still a work in progress.
Often times though, these documents were created in a word processing program such as Microsoft Word, which leaves a trail of information regarding the life of the document itself. The use of a skilled attorney or a forensic examiner can lead to the discovery of every detail regarding the document.
The metadata contained in documents will include ‘tags’ and information regarding when and by whom the document was created, what changes were ever made to the document, and even what else may have been on the creator’s computer screen when making the document. For example, a forensic examination of a single fax cover letter can reveal not only the name and fax number but can also reveal every message sent by that user, using the same fax template. The metadata can reveal this information because when text is deleted using a word processor program, it is never truly removed from the document. In reality, when deleting the text the processor is simply instructed not to print or display the data. Knowledge of what the creator thought was deleted can be an extremely useful tool, for persuasive, substantive and impeachment purposes throughout the trial.
The hiring of an expert Data Forensics Expert may well be a justified expense when in the best interests of a client. The examiner will be able to help paint a picture by providing a storyline with corroborating evidence including creation and edits dates, authorship, all communications regarding the document and potentially even the intent behind the acts. Such experts should be used in cases where substantial hidden digital evidence may exist. This is not restricted to intellectual property cases but may involve every area of law, including family law, breach of contract, discrimination and sexual harassment.